12/11 the 12/7 issue without title but same content still blocked

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries.”
Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests”
Henry Kissinger, National Security Study Memo 200, 04//24/74

"the bourgeoisie is unfit any longer to be the ruling class in society, and to impose its conditions of existence upon society as an overriding law. It is unfit to rule because it is incompetent to assure an existence to its slave within his slavery ... What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers...."
Marx and Engels: The Communist Manifesto, 1848

Another face of U.S. war for world domination: this legally protected cold-blooded mass murder continues today against its Indian 'ally'
A Cloud Still Hangs Over Bhopal
Op-Ed By Suketu Mehta
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/opinion/03mehta.html?th&emc=th
...This is the 25th anniversary of the Bhopal gas disaster, an epic mess that started when a pesticide plant owned by the American chemical giant Union Carbide leaked a cloud of poisonous gas. Before the sun rose, almost 4,000 human beings capable of love and anguish sank to their knees and did not get up. Half a million more fell ill, many with severely damaged lungs and eyes.
An additional 15,000 people have since died from the aftereffects, and 10 to 30 people are said to die every month from exposure to the hundreds of tons of toxic waste left over in the former factory. But amazingly, the site still has not been cleaned up, because Dow Chemical, which since acquired Union Carbide, refuses to accept any responsibility. The groundwater is contaminated; children of the survivors suffer from genetic abnormalities; and the victims have long since run out of their measly compensation and are begging on the streets...

In 2001, the maker of napalm married the bane of Bhopal: Dow Chemical bought Union Carbide for $11.6 billion and promptly distanced itself from the disaster. If Union Carbide was at fault, that was too bad; it had just ceased to exist. In 2002, Dow set aside $2.2 billion to cover potential liabilities arising from Union Carbide’s American asbestos production... the total settlement for Bhopal was $470 million...a Dow spokeswoman explained, that “is plenty good for an Indian.”...Union Carbide and Dow were allowed to get away with it because of the international legal structures that protect multinationals from liability. Union Carbide sold its Indian subsidiary and pulled out of India. Warren Anderson, the Union Carbide chief executive at the time of the gas leak, lives in luxurious exile in the Hamptons, even though there’s an international arrest warrant out for him for culpable homicide. The Indian government has yet to pursue an extradition request. Imagine if an Indian chief executive had jumped bail for causing an industrial disaster that killed tens of thousands of Americans. What are the chances he’d be sunning himself in Goa?
The Indian government, fearful of scaring away foreign investors, has not pushed the issue with American authorities. Dow has used a kind of blackmail with the Indians; a 2006 letter from Andrew Liveris, the chief executive, to India’s ambassador to the United States asked for guarantees that Dow would not be held liable for the cleanup, and thanked him for his “efforts to ensure that we have the appropriate investment climate.”

Bhopal survivors demand action
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/12/2009123591239173.html
Shortly after midnight on December 3, 1984, about 40 tonnes of the highly poisonous methyl isocyanate gas leaked from a tank at the Union Carbide plant in Bhopal. The state-run Indian Council of Medical Research says 8,000-10,000 people were killed within three days and 25,000 more subsequently died from the effects of exposure. More than 500,000 people are estimated to have been affected by the leak. US chemical firm Union Carbide says the leak was an act of sabotage by a disgruntled employee - never identified - and not lax safety standards or faulty plant design..
Union Carbide, owned by Dow Chemical [2001], says the legal case was resolved in 1989 when it settled with the Indian government for $470m compensation ...only part has reached some victims ...New studies say the area around the abandoned plant remains contaminated. Tests at Swiss and British laboratories indicated concentrations of some toxins were actually rising "as the chemicals leach through the soil and into the aquifer"..The group said the government was not providing enough clean drinking water, forcing many residents to use the contaminated groundwater. "Not surprisingly, the populations in the areas surveyed have high rates of birth defects, rapidly rising cancer rates, neurological damage, chaotic menstrual cycles and mental illness," BMA said in the report. A separate study... by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), showed a hand-pump 3km from the former Union Carbide plant contained 110 times the maximum concentration of the pesticide carbaryl deemed safe in Indian bottled water...The state government says residual chemicals in the ground are harmless and it is providing clean water to residents by tankers. It also dismisses assertions the birth defects are related to the disaster...Dow says responsibility for the factory now rests with the Madhya Pradesh government.

"Patriotism is a religion, the egg from which wars are hatched."
Guy de Maupassant

U.S. TRIGGER FOR WW2 TO DEFEAT ITS STRATEGIC ENEMY THE REVOLUTIONARY SOCIALIST SOVIET UNION & ESTABLISH GLOBAL HEGEMONY
Dec. 7, 1941, Japanese warplanes attacked the home base of the U.S. Pacific fleet at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, drawing the United States into World War II.
"American intelligence recruited the ex-Nazis in the Cold War fight against Communism..."
U.S. given heads-upon Holocaust, scholars say
http://www.sltrib.com/2004/May/05142004/nation_w/166407.aspUSA Today
WASHINGTON -- U.S. intelligence officials learned in the opening months of World War II that Nazi Germany planned mass killings to eliminate Jews, scholars reviewing newly declassified reports said Thursday. But the U.S. government gave the information low priority in August 1942, the scholars concluded, not acknowledging that Germany had a plan to exterminate Jews until six months later. "It was an intelligence failure," said Richard Breitman, an American University Holocaust historian who studied the documents.
Breitman was part of a team of scholars, citizens and government officials who reviewed more than 240,000 pages of documents at the National Archives related to Nazi and other World War II-era crimes. The material was from files of the FBI, CIA and its predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services... Scholars said the declassified documents show:
* The CIA recruited as intelligence sources 23 Germans who appeared to have perpetrated war crimes.
* The U.S. Army protected another 100 German spies.
* The FBI and CIA helped Nazis or Nazi collaborators with intelligenc value elude war-crimes prosecution.
* The agencies pressured the Immigration and Naturalization Service to let war criminals working with American authorities resettle in the United States.
American intelligence recruited the ex-Nazis in the Cold War fight against Communism, some documents show.

Incontrovertible finely detailed documentation - capped by uber-patriot political conclusion that FDR, imperialist godfather par excellence, was really a "communist traitor"
"...everything that the Japanese were planning to do was known to the United States..." ARMY BOARD, 1944
President Roosevelt (FDR) provoked the attack, knew about it in advance and covered up his failure to warn the Hawaiian commanders. FDR needed the attack to sucker Hitler to declare war, since the public and Congress were overwhelmingly against entering the war in Europe. It was his backdoor to war.
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/pearl/www.geocities.com/Pentag...

the global terror war is doomed to defeat too
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller, 1994 Statement to the United Nations Business Council

Pearl Harbor: Official Lies in an American War Tragedy
May 24, 2000
Robert B. Stinnett
Former Journalist, Oakland Tribune and BBC. Author of the books, George Bush: His World War II Years and Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor.
The great question of Pearl Harbor—what did U.S. government officials know and when did they know it?—has been argued for years. After decades of Freedom of Information Act requests, Robert Stinnett was finally able to examine the long-hidden evidence, shattering every shibboleth of Pearl Harbor. He finds that not only was the attack expected, it was deliberately provoked through an eight-step program devised by the Navy for President Franklin Roosevelt. Could Pearl Harbor have neither been an “accident” nor a mere “failure” of U.S. intelligence nor a “brilliant” Japanese military coup? Could the tragedy at Pearl Harbor have been a carefully orchestrated design, initiated at the highest government levels in order to galvanize a peace-loving American public to go to war? http://www.independent.org/events/detail.asp?eventID=28

"some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" needed to trigger US imperialist world war of terror starting with Iraq
Were 1998 Memos a Blueprint for War?
Nightline March 5, 2003. March 10 http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=128491
Years before George W. Bush entered the White House, and years before the Sept. 11 attacks set the direction of his presidency, a group of influential neo-conservatives hatched a plan to get Saddam Hussein out of power.... the Project for the New American Century, or PNAC, was founded in 1997. Among its supporters were...Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz.
In open letters to Clinton and GOP congressional leaders the next year, the group called for a shift toward a more assertive U.S. policy in the Middle East, including the use of force if necessary to unseat Saddam Hussein.... America was being too timid, and too weak, and too unassertive in the post-Cold War era." In reports, speeches, papers and books, they pushed for an aggressive foreign policy to defend U.S. interests around the globe. Clinton did order airstrikes against Iraq in 1998, but through the rest of his presidency and the beginning of Bush's, America's "containment" policy for Saddam lay dormant  until September 2001... in a report just before the 2000 election that would bring Bush to power, they predicted the shift would come about slowly, unless there were "some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor." That event came on Sept. 11, 2001. By that time, Cheney was vice president, Rumsfeld was secretary of defense, and Wolfowitz his deputy at the Pentagon. The next morning — before it was even clear who was behind the attacks — Rumsfeld insisted at a Cabinet meeting that Saddam's Iraq should be "a principal target of the first round of terrorism," according to Bob Woodward's book Bush At War. What started as a theory in 1997 was becoming official U.S. foreign policy.

"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's Minister of Propaganda

in case 911 fervor isn't cooking yet...
Homeland Security chief warns of threat from al-Qaeda sympathizers in U.S.
Al-Qaeda followers are inside the United States and would like to attack targets here and in other countries, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday night. The secretary's bluntest assessment yet of terror threats within the country came one day after President Obama, announcing his decision to send 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan, warned that extremists have been "sent here from the border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan to commit more acts of terror." Addressing the America-Israel Friendship League in New York, Napolitano said a string of recent domestic arrests should "remove any remaining comfort that some might have had from the notion that if we fight the terrorists abroad, we won't have to fight them here," rebutting an argument advanced on several occasions by President George W. Bush... http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/02/AR200912...

Chief of U.S. Central Command Petraeus says al-Qaida no longer operating in Afghanistan.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/10/petraeus-alqaida-not-oper_n_201...
Osama bin Laden used to be the man President Bush promised to capture dead or alive. Now he's the authority President Bush quotes to bolster his claim that Iraq is the "central front in the war on terror." In his speech Tuesday night at Fort Bragg, N.C., President Bush said bin Laden claimed a "Third World War is raging" in Iraq... it is so much harder having invoked the instigator of 9/11, to sell the Bush administration's continuing pretense that ousting Saddam Hussein and invading Iraq was a necessary response to 9/11.http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/palmbeach/editorial/entries/2005/06/bush_says_iraq.html

Bush shuns latest Taleban offer
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/1599443.stm
October 14, 2001
President Bush rejected ‘non-negotiable’ offer by the Taliban to discuss turning over Osama bin Laden, suspected of masterminding last month's terror attacks on the United States, if the United States ended the bombing in Afghanistan as second week of US-led air raids began. The Taleban's second-in-command, Maulvi Abdul Kabir, said Bin Laden could be sent to a neutral country if the US halted air strikes, and repeated a demand to be shown evidence of his connection to the attacks.

Media Lies Fuel War: The Taliban Have Agreed To Extradite Bin Laden
1 October 2001
http://www.j-n-v.org/AW_briefings/ARROW_briefing004.htm
A critical issue in the war debate is whether or not it is possible to secure the extradition of Osama bin Laden from Afghanistan without the use of military force. The position of the Government is that it is impossible to negotiate with the Taliban regime, and that the use of force is inevitable.The media has colluded with the Government in effectively suppressing the real position of the Taliban... The media are playing a crucial role in shaping public opinion, which in turn is a major factor in the ability of the US and UK to go to war.... twisting what is actually a serious negotiating step by the Taliban into a casus belli. 'Conflict in Afghanistan moved a step closer yesterday after the Taliban said Osama bin Laden was under their control but gave no indication they were prepared to hand him over.' (Independent, 1 Oct., p. 1) The second half of this opening sentence is flatly contradicted by the quotation eight paragraphs later of an offer from the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef: 'We are thinking of negotiation. [If direct evidence of bin Laden's involvement were produced] it might change things.' (Independent, 1 Oct., p.1)...
The New York Times reported Mullah Zaeef as saying, 'As long as they are not taking the way of negotiations and talks, we are not going to discuss any surrenders'. ('Bin Laden Still in Afghanistan Under Taliban's Control, It Says', NYT website, 30 Sept., 03:04 EDT) The opening of negotiations and the provision of evidence are the two key pre-conditions to the extradition of bin Laden, it is clear. What is also clear is that the Taliban are not refusing point-blank to extradite bin Laden. They are not ruling extradition out entirely. They may even be 'pleading' with the United States.
These statements are consistent with previous Taliban offers (details in full in ARROW Anti-War Briefing 2 ). The Taliban Information Minister, Qudrutullah Jamal, said, 'Anyone who is responsible for this act, Osama or not, we will not side with him. We told [the Pakistan delegation] to give us proof that he did it, because without that how can we give him up?' (Independent, 19 Sept., p. 1)
On 21 Sept., Ambassador Zaeef said, 'We are not ready to hand over Osama bin Laden without evidence' (emphasis added, Times, 22 Sept., p. 1). When US Secretary of State Colin Powell promised to publish the dossier of evidence against bin Laden (an offer subsequently withdrawn), Ambassador Zaeef responded positively. 'The ambassador said it was "good news" that the US intended to produce its evidence against Mr bin Laden. This could help to solve the issue "otherwise than fighting".' (Independent, 25 Sept., p. 3)

Obama: Killing Bin Laden 'Top Priority'
11-16-08
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2008/11/obama-killing-bin-laden-top-...

“bin Laden doesn’t fit with the administration’s strategy for combating terrorism
Bush: Capturing Bin Laden Is ‘Not A Top Priority Use of American Resources’
Just months after declaring he wanted bin Laden “dead or alive ,” Bush said: "I don’t know where he is. You know, I just don’t spend that much time on him...I’ll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. [3/13/02 Turning his attention away from bin Laden, Bush trained his focus on Iraq
.” Barnes said that Bush told him capturing bin Laden is “not a top priority use of American

Osama Bin Dead
by Rand Clifford
http://www.starchiefpress.com/articles/article15.html
And now Bush [Obama] is reminding us that we must work together to battle extremists who try to imitate our murder of the innocent in order to achieve political objectives. Perhaps the most dangerous problem of all is that the American herd continues to swallow outrageous and incredible bullshit as though it were truth....
The "experts" know bin Laden is dead, so do the intelligence analysts, and everyone with any genuine knowledge of the situation—even Bush knows...! Fox "News" ran, Wednesday, December 26, 2001, Report: Bin Laden Already Dead [1]. On Thursday, 18 July, 2002, the BBC: Bin Laden "probably" dead [2]. CNN.com followed their own story of Monday, October 7, 2002 about bin Laden’s death [3] with the Saturday, October 26, 2002: Magazine runs what it calls bin Laden’s will [4]. An excellent overview plus many more links can be found at the WHAT REALLY HAPPENED website [5].
[1] http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html
[2] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/2135473.stm
[3] http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/
[4] http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/10/26/binladen.will/
[5] http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osama_dead.html
[6] http://www.newamericancentury.org/

It Doesn't Take Intelligence...
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2008/11/it-doesnt-take-intelligence-...
In a brilliantly-timed speech before the Atlantic Council today, the politically-astute retired Air Force Gen. Mike Hayden, CIA director [director of the National Security Agency after 9/11 when it began warrantless surveillance of U.S. phone calls...also defended CIA destroying interrogation videos... loyalists griped the abusive sessions were all authorized by his predecessor, Clinton holdover George Tenet.] took a sharp turn away from President Bush’s well-worn talking points on fighting terrorism and essentially endorsed Obama’s campaign position that the “central front” is in the Afghan-Pakistan tribal belt. “Today, the flow of money, weapons, and foreign fighters into Iraq is greatly diminished, and Al Qaeda senior leaders no longer point to it as the central battlefield,” Hayden declared ...two months ago, Bush told the National Defense University in a speech: “Al Qaeda leaders have repeatedly declared that Iraq is the central front of their war with America.” [ed: referring to made-in-usa tapes]

Obama: "Capture Or Kill" Bin Laden
1-14-09
Couric: How important do you think it is, Mr. President-elect, to apprehend Osama bin Laden?
Obama: I think that we have to so weaken his infrastructure that, whether he is technically alive or not, he is so pinned down that he cannot function. My preference obviously would be to capture or kill him. But if we have so tightened the noose that he's in a cave somewhere and can't even communicate with his operatives, then we will meet our goal of protecting America.

Osama bin Laden Issues New Threat Against America
http://current.com/1ijsm4c
03 June 2009
Osama bin Laden threatened Americans in a new audio tape Wednesday, saying President Barack Obama inflamed hatred toward the U.S. by ordering Pakistan to crack down on militants in Swat Valley and block Islamic law there.... The message was broadcast on pan-Arab Al-Jazeera Television around the same time Obama touched down in Saudi Arabia at the start of a Mideast visit ... Bin Laden focused on Pakistan, claiming President Asif Ali Zardari was paid by the White House to start the crackdown. Al-Jazeera aired excerpts of the tape and did not say how it was obtained. The authenticity of the tape could not be immediately verified.

bogeyman pretext propaganda wires crossed
Gates Expects 2-4 Years of Big Afghan Role for U.S.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Osama bin Laden may be slipping back and forth from Pakistan to Afghanistan. Or the U.S. might not have a clue, more than eight years after the al-Qaida leader masterminded the terrorist attacks on America. Given a chance to clear away some of the mystery surrounding the whereabouts of the world's most wanted terrorist, Obama administration officials seemed to add to it with what appeared to be conflicting assessments... http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/12/06/world/AP-US-US-Afghanistan.ht...

No Bin Laden information in years, says Gates
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8397684.stm
12-6-09
Mr Gates told ABC News Sunday "Well, we don't know for a fact where Osama Bin Laden is. If we did, we'd go get him." ... asked by ABC's This Week programme when the US last had any good intelligence on the whereabouts of the al-Qaeda leader, Mr Gates said: "I think it's been years."... Mr Gates' comments came after US President Barack Obama announced a decision this week to send 30,000 more US troops to Afghanistan. Mr Obama said al-Qaeda leaders had escaped into Pakistan in 2001 and 2002 and had been able to "retain their safe-havens along the border"... Last week, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown called on Pakistan to do more to find Mr Bin Laden... Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani responded saying he did not think Bin Laden was in Pakistan, that his country had yet to be given any "credible or actionable information" by the US on Bin Laden.

"Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man's original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress had been made, through disobedience and through rebellion."
Oscar Wilde