None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free
"... imperialism as the slave system of the West is called... It's one huge complex or combine, creates what's known not as the American power structure or the French power structure, but the international power structure... used to suppress the masses of dark-skinned people all over the world and exploit them of their natural resources."
The Plan is for the United States to rule the world. The overt theme is unilateralism, but it is ultimately a story of domination. It calls for the United States to maintain its overwhelming superiority and prevent new rivals from rising up to challenge it on the world stage. It calls for dominion over friends and enemies alike. It says not that the United States must be more powerful, or most powerful, but that it must be absolutely powerful. Vice-President Dick Cheney - lecture at West Point, June 2002
US PARTNERS: NATURAL DISASTERS & PANDEMICS
As Hurricane Matthew moves out, Zika could move in
WASHINGTON 10/11/16 http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article107108352.h...
As Hurricane Matthew waters began to recede, coastal residents from Florida to the Carolinas may have something else to worry about: Zika...
“It knocks a lot of stuff down so you just have a lot more things in which the mosquito can breed. A damaged rain gutter, for instance, becomes a rain collector. Every little object that blows off a house or even a chair flipped over on a porch becomes a container for mosquitoes to breed” said Philip Stoddard, mayor of South Miami. And a Florida International University biology professor...
Kevin A. Caillouët, now assistant director of the St Tammany Parish Mosquito Abatement District near New Orleans, emphasized that West Nile and Zika are two different diseases and earlier studies showed no increase in viruses after storms. But common characteristics should be taken into consideration he said. Hurricanes cause people to change daily habits, which can make them vulnerable to bug bites by, for example, opening doors because the air conditioning doesn’t work and spending more time outside fixing what was broken. “So when you’re out there rebuilding your house, you’re not thinking about the mosquitoes biting at your ankles at the time,You’re thinking about getting your house back in order.”
Raising concerns...according to a 2008 CDC study. a spike in neurological disease cases associated with the West Nile Virus after Hurricane Katrina... “an immediate increase in cases may be attributed to increased human exposure to mosquitoes...Tens of thousands of people in Louisiana were living in damaged housing or waiting outside for days to be evacuated” ...
CDC officials said hurricanes and floods do not typically cause an increase in the spread viruses by mosquitoes, but spokesman Benjamin Haynes acknowledged some could and it’s better to take precautions...The hurricane was expected to temporarily interrupt mosquito control efforts in Miami as spraying pesticides would not be effective during strong winds.Gov. Rick Scott asked Florida residents to drain standing water before and after the hurricane.
Derric Nimmo, principal scientist at*Oxitec which developed genetically modified mosquitoes being considered for release in Key West, said..“But if you pull those factors together, they got Zika, they got active transmissions, they got the mosquito. The rain will dump a lot of water. Then the risk should be taken into consideration that it’s going to be relatively high that it might spread.”
HAITI 2010 digest issue links
1/21/10 Haiti: Pre-Earthquake Simulation Israel: Image is Capital http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/266
1/19 One Week of War: Barbarity Born of Fear and Vulnerability http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/265
1/17 Fear of Haiti's Revolutionary Potential... a Haitian Holocaust http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/264
1/15 Haiti: How & Why this Horror is Sickeningly Familiar http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/263
*Oxitec, subsidiary of Intrexon Corporation (NYSE: XON), genetically engineers biology to help solve some of the world’s biggest problems.
Oxitec Wants To Release Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Into Florida Keys
07/16/2012 11:40 am ET | Updated Jul 17, 2012 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/16/oxitec-mutant-mosquitoes_n_1676...
...Oxitec admits their system isn’t foolproof, about one female is accidentally released for every 1,500 male mosquitoes, according to New Times, and it’s the females that bite and suck blood. In April, the Florida Keys Environmental Coalition wrote to Gov. Rick Scott, asking him to stop Oxitec, pointing to the unknown consequences of being bitten by a rogue GM female mosquitos: “… biting female mosquitoes could inject an engineered protein into humans along with other proteins from the mosquitos’ salivary gland. Oxitec has yet to conduct or publish any study showing that this protein is not expressed in the salivary gland and therefore cannot be passed on to humans.”
In June 2005, Oxitec was awarded US$4.8m as part of an international consortium within the Grand Challenges for Global Health initiative, led by the Gates Foundation (in partnership with the Wellcome Trust, US Foundation for National Institutes of Health and Canadian Institutes for Health Research).34,35,36,37
From an issue in an excellent source: GENE WATCH, http://www.genewatch.org/uploads/f03c6d66a9b354535738483c1c3d49e4/Oxitec...
“A leader in DNA Synthetic Biology”
Intrexon Corporate Profile
Intrexon Corporation, founded in 1998, is a leader in synthetic biology focused on collaboration with companies in Health, Food, Energy, Environment and Consumer sectors to create biologically based products that improve quality of life and the health of the planet. At present rates of global industrialization and population growth, food and energy supplies and environmental and healthcare resources are becoming scarcer.... Intrexon’s leading Better DNA® approach to synthetic biology has the potential to provide new, more effective and sustainable solutions to address these challenges. With a suite of proprietary and complementary technologies...engineering biological systems to enable DNA-based control over the function and output of living cells...
Subsidiaries Intrexon has multiple subsidiaries in which it holds a majority or wholly-owned interest today, including:
Trans Ova Genetics - wholly owned subsidiary of Intrexon, internationally recognized as a provider of industry-leading bovine reproductive technologies.
Okanagan Specialty Fruits (OSF) - wholly owned subsidiary of Intrexon, the pioneering agricultural company behind the non-browning Arctic® apple.
Oxitec - wholly owned subsidiary of Intrexon...pioneer of safe, innovative, self-limiting biological control solutions of insects that spread disease and cause crop damage.
AquaBounty Technologies, Inc. - majority owned subsidiary of Intrexon, pioneer utilizing modern molecular biology to improve aquaculture in environmentally sustainable manner.
Biological & Popular Culture, Inc. (BioPop) - majority owned subsidiary of Intrexon, focuses on developing "living art" concepts.
U.S. Government Secret Experimentation with Biological and Chemical Warfare (good sources)
by Mitchel Cohen http://nospray.org/the-u-s-governments-secret-experimentation-with-biolo...
* Name of Depositor J.Casals, Rockefeller Foundation
Source 1947 Blood from experimental forest sentinel rhesus monkey, Uganda, 194
Isolations and Serological Specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 46: 509-520, 1952. PubMed: 12995440 Comparative genomic analysis of pre-epidemic and epidemic Zika virus strains for virological factors potentially associated with the rapidly expanding epidemic. Emerg Microbes Infect 5: e22, 2016.
Zika virus ATCC® VR-84™
Add to Cart
Florida Dengue Fever Outbreak Leads Back to CIA and Army Experiments
21 July 2010 http://truth-out.org/archive/component/k2/item/90808:florida-dengue-feve...
By HP Albarelli Jr and Zoe Martell
.....dengue fever has been the intense focus of US Army and CIA biological warfare researchers for over 50 years. Ed Regis notes in his excellent history of Fort Detrick, "The Biology of Doom," that as early as 1942 leading biochemists at the installation placed dengue fever on a long list for serious consideration as a possible weapon. In the early 1950s, Fort Detrick, in partnership with the CIA, launched a multi-million dollar research program under which dengue fever and several addition exotic diseases were studied for use in offensive biological warfare attacks.... Reads one CIA Project Artichoke document: "Not all viruses have to be lethal ... the objective also includes those that act as short-term and long-term incapacitants." Several CIA documents, as well as the findings of a 1975 Congressional committee, reveal that three sites in Florida, Key West, Panama City and Avon Park, as well as two other locations in central Florida, were used for experiments with mosquito-borne dengue fever and other biological substances.
The experiments in Avon Park, about 170 miles from Miami, were covertly conducted in a low-income African-American neighborhood that contained several newly constructed public housing projects. CIA documents related to its top-secret Project MK/NAOMI clearly indicate that the mosquitoes used in Avon Park were the Aedes aegypti type. Specially equipped aircraft, in one of the larger experiments, released 600,000 mosquitoes over the area. In one of the Avon Park experiments, about 150,000 mosquitoes were dropped in paper bags designed to open upon impact with the ground. Each bag held about 1,000 insects. Besides dengue, some of the mosquitoes were also carrying yellow fever.
A 1978 Pentagon publication, entitled "Biological Warfare: Secret Testing & Volunteers," reveals that the Army's Chemical Corps and Special Operations and Projects Divisions at Fort Detrick conducted "tests" similar to the Avon Park experiments in Key West, but the bulk of the documentation concerning this highly classified and covert work is still held by the Pentagon as "secret." One former Fort Detrick researcher says the Army "performed a number of experiments in the area of the Keys," that "not all concerned dengue virus."
In 1959, Fort Detrick launched its largest mosquito experiment called Operation Bellwether, consisting of over 50 field experiments...some designed to ascertain the "rate of biting" and "mosquito aggressiveness," were conducted in partnership with scientists with the * Rockefeller Institute patent where scientists bred their own strain of mosquitoes. Some Bellwether experiments were conducted in Florida, as well as in other states, including Georgia, Maryland, Utah and Arizona.
The 1978 Pentagon publication, along with two other Chemical Corps reports, reveal the identities of a number of the companies and institutions that assisted the Army in its offensive biological warfare experiments: Armour Research Foundation (1951-1954); the Battelle Memorial Institute (1952-1965); Ben Venue Labs, Inc. (1953-1954); University of Florida (1953-1956); Florida State University (1951-1953); and the Lovell Chemical Company (1951-1955).
In the spring and summer of 1981, Cuba experienced a severe hemorrhagic dengue fever epidemic. Between May and October 1981, the island nation had 158 dengue-related deaths with about 75,000 reported infection cases. Prior to this outbreak, Cuba had reported only a very small number of cases in 1944 and 1977. At the height of the epidemic, over 10,000 people per day were found infected and 116,150 were hospitalized. At the same time as the 1981 outbreak, covert biological warfare attacks on Cuba's residents and crops were believed to have been conducted against the island by CIA contractors and military airplane flyovers. Particularly harmful to the nation was a severe outbreak of swine flu that Fidel Castro attributed to the CIA. American researcher William H. Schaap, an editor of Covert Action magazine, claims the Cuba dengue outbreak was the result of CIA activities. Former Fort Detrick researchers, all of whom refused to have their names used for this article, say they performed "advance work" on the Cuba outbreak and that it was "man made."
In 1982, the Soviet media reported that the CIA sent operatives into Afghanistan from Pakistan to launch a dengue epidemic. The Soviets claimed the operatives were posing as malaria workers, but, instead, were releasing dengue-infected mosquitoes. The CIA denied the charges. In 1985 and 1986, authorities in Nicaragua accused the CIA of creating a massive outbreak of dengue fever that infected thousands in that country. CIA officials denied any involvement, but Army researchers admitted that intensive work with arthropod vectors for offensive biological warfare objectives had been conducted at Fort Detrick in the early 1980s, having first started in the early 1950s. Fort Detrick researchers reported that huge colonies of mosquitoes infected with not only dengue virus, but also yellow fever, were maintained at the Frederick, Maryland, installation, as well as hordes of flies carrying cholera and anthrax and thousands of ticks filled with Colorado fever and relapsing fever.
A review of declassified Army Chemical Corps documents reveal that the Army may have also been engaged in dengue fever research as early as the late 1940s. Several redacted Camp Detrick and Edgewood Arsenal reports indicate that experiments were conducted on state and federal prisoners who were unwitting exposed to dengue fever, as well as other viruses, some possibly lethal. Freedom of Information requests filed months ago for details on these early experiments remain unanswered.
Dengue Fever and BP Spill Complications
The timing of this outbreak of dengue fever presents two additional problems; the symptoms of dengue fever are very similar to that of exposures to chemicals such as those contained in crude oil and the dispersants currently being used in the contaminated areas of the Gulf of Mexico, potentially making it difficult to diagnose the source of a sufferer's symptoms. Worse yet, there looms the possibility that Corexit and other toxins present in the Gulf area may weaken the immune system, thus, setting the stage for more severe forms of the disease in people who are, or have previously been, exposed to the virus.
It is still unclear to what degree residents of the Gulf area, at large, have been or will be exposed to such chemicals in the long term, but there is mounting evidence that fishermen, cleanup workers, and others who spend significant time in contact with the Gulf waters are beginning to display symptoms consistent with chemically induced neurotoxicity. If dengue fever also spreads within the Gulf community, affecting a significant number of people, it will be increasingly difficult to differentiate the cause of symptoms in those who develop them; even in persons who test positive for dengue exposure, the additional possibility remains that chemical toxicity is present as well.
The presentation of dengue fever varies considerably from case to case. Numerous medical studies have identified asymptomatic infections, or infections that consist of only mild, flu-like symptoms that would likely not result in the sufferer seeking medical attention.
When more troubling symptoms are present, they vary considerably in severity. According to the CDC, milder cases of dengue fever are identified by a high fever accompanied by at least two of the following symptoms: severe headache; severe eye pain (behind eyes); joint pain; muscle and/or bone pain; rash; a mild bleeding manifestation such as bleeding gums, nose bleeds, or easy bruising; and low white cell count. In more severe cases, dengue can cause severe abdominal pain or persistent vomiting; red blotches or patches on the skin; more severe bleeding of nose or gums; vomiting of blood; black, tarry excrement (indicative of the presence of blood in the stool); drowsiness; irritability; cold or clammy skin; pallor; and difficulty breathing. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene has reported cases of dengue fever that resulted in neurological manifestations, as well.
Dengue fever can also cause a much more serious, hemorrhagic form of the disease, the presentation of which the CDC describes as follows:
"[A] fever that lasts from 2 to 7 days, with general signs and symptoms consistent with dengue fever. When the fever declines, warning signs may develop. This marks the beginning of a 24 to 48 hour period when the smallest blood vessels (capillaries) become excessively permeable ("leaky"), allowing the fluid component to escape from the blood vessels into the peritoneum (causing ascites) and pleural cavity (leading to pleural effusions). This may lead to failure of the circulatory system and shock and possibly death without prompt, appropriate treatment. In addition, the patient with DHF has a low platelet count and hemorrhagic manifestations, tendency to bruise easily or have other types of skin hemorrhages, bleeding nose or gums and possibly internal bleeding."
As if this were not troubling enough, let us compare the above symptom picture to the symptoms associated with exposure to the dispersants Corexit 9500 and Corexit 9527. The exact risks of exposure to these chemicals have yet to be determined; in fact, the manufacturers' material safety data sheet (MSDS) for Corexit 9500 states: "No toxicity studies have been conducted on this product." The MSDS further states that one should not come in contact with the product or breathe its vapors and that adequate protective skin protection and breathing apparatuses should be worn when handling or working with the compound. Any hints of safe usage within the MSDS on these chemicals should be viewed from the following perspective: the MSDS data assumes limited exposure (for example, while applying the chemical) and the use of adequate protective gear. These statistics do not apply, therefore, to unprotected people who may be subject to long-term, consistent exposure.
Many toxicologists have raised grave concerns, however, about the risks that these dispersants may pose to residents of the Gulf of Mexico area. Dr. Susan Shaw, a marine toxicologist, talked about her recent experience with shrimpers who had been working in the Gulf waters. In an interview on CNN, she addressed the situation of a shrimper who had thrown his net into water, causing the water to splash onto his unprotected skin. She reported that he developed a "headache that lasted 3 weeks, heart palpitations, muscle spasms, bleeding from the rectum ..." and continued, "and that's what this Corexit does, it ruptures red blood cells, causes internal bleeding and liver and kidney damage. ..." She asserts that the combination of oil from the well, combined with Corexit dispersant, increases the toxicity of both substances. In combination, she believes that they are skin permeable and that they aerosolize to produce a breathing hazard as well. The toxins can enter the body through the respiratory tract, but are unlikely to remain localized in the lungs, instead spreading throughout one's entire body system.
Numerous reports have come in from both residents of the Gulf area and journalists visiting the area that many people who are exposed to the water are beginning to experience health problems. Among the most commonly reported symptoms are burning eyes, skin rashes, lightheadedness, dizziness, difficulty breathing, transient numbness and shooting pains, persistent coughing, sore throats, muscle and bone aches, weakness and severe fatigue. More troubling reports, such as those of the shrimpers mentioned above, have included bleeding from the nose and from the rectum, as well as permanent numbness in extremities and complete loss of the sense of smell. It is generally accepted in the medical literature that, although the initial, acute presentation of toxic exposure is generally the most severe, symptoms may linger indefinitely or even result in permanent damage to the body.
Herein lies the dilemma: If a Gulf resident becomes ill, to what do we attribute his or her symptoms? In addition to the dispersants themselves, Gulf residents are potentially suffering from exposure to benzene and other toxic chemicals that are naturally present in crude oil, as well as several potentially toxic gases being released from the well. In combination with the dispersant, the exact toxicity risk of these chemicals remains unknown.
Add now, to the picture, the risk of having contracted dengue fever and the puzzle becomes more difficult to piece together. The CDC's 2009 survey contained samples from only 240 households and determined that about 5 percent of the residents had antibodies to the dengue virus, indicating either current infection or a prior exposure. This relatively small sample may not be indicative of the Florida population as a whole and may not be a valid indicator of the overall number of exposed people in the surrounding areas.
The medical literature indicates that dengue virus, like many other viruses, may remain in the body in a latent form; during latency, the virus is unlikely to cause symptoms. A second infection with dengue, however, can lead to a much more severe presentation of the disease and a greater likelihood of it progressing to its hemorrhagic (and potentially fatal) form. Likewise, the literature indicates that a severe assault to the immune system presents a risk of virus reactivation and resultant disease.
Dr. Shaw's assessment of the dangers of Corexit dispersant, particularly in combination with the other contaminants resulting from the damaged BP oil well, includes the potential for severe damage to the immune system. Such immune system suppression or damage, it seems, could then reactivate dengue fever in residents who carry the latent virus, perhaps even resulting in a more severe form of the disease's presentation.
Assuming the above quoted assessments of the current situation in Florida are accurate, the presence of the dengue virus in Florida at this time makes for a nightmarish picture. Not only is there a tremendous symptom overlap between dengue virus and toxin exposure, up to and including the potential for a hemorrhagic presentation of both, but there looms on the horizon a new and frightening possibility: The combined presence of this disease and a toxic environment might have the potential to combine, making an already tragic situation incrementally worse.
H.P. Albarelli Jr. author of "A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA's Secret Cold War Experiments" (TrineDay, 2010). book documents and details top-secret research at the Army's Fort Detrick and numerous CIA and Pentagon experiments on unwitting human subjects. Albarelli is a founding member of the ,North American Truth and Accountability Commission on Human Experimentation.
Zoe Martell, a lecturer in psychology at San Francisco State University; much of her work has focused on people suffering from chronic illnesses, also an artist currently working toward a dual master's degree at San Francisco Art Institute.
In under eighteen months a ‘mutagenic chain reaction’ that can drive a genetic trait through an entire species (and maybe eradicate that species) has gone from theory to published proof of principle to...a US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) high profile study co-funded by DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation....Both institutions are significantly invested in gene drive research.... a gene drive ensures a chosen genetic trait will be passed on to the next generation and every generation thereafter.. the engineered trait is driven through an entire population, re-engineering not just single organisms but enforcing the change in every descendant - re-shaping entire species and ecosystems... There are many scenarios for potential weaponisation of gene drives and ramifications from unintended effects. Imagine a hostile actor could... quietly introducing a gene drive or insert a gene drive into a biting insect population to deliver toxins. Gene drive technology will quickly and inevitably end up controlled by powerful military actors and decisions on gene drive use and development will be determined by geopolitical and security considerations as well as commercial and trade interests. The same US research agency (DARPA) who paid for the NAS study made it known they are going all-in on gene drive research and development of ‘robust’ synthetic organisms... https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/jun/09/the-na...
National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200 The Kissinger Report
Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests ...“Depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world ...
Pregnant Women Anxious as Florida Zika Test Results Take Weeks
The delays began with a well-intentioned and much-applauded offer. On Aug. 3, Gov. Rick Scott announced that the state would provide the costly Zika tests to all pregnant women, a move intended to quell fears and allow low-income or uninsured women to be tested...Florida forbids abortions after 24 weeks..private tests range from $120 to $750...in a smal number of Florida cases the long wait can be traced to a final test that must be analyzed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or an approved laboratory to confirm the presence of the virus. [...]
Only US STATE AGENCIES CAN CONFIRM ZIKA VIRUS (vs. ‘signs of infecetion’)
Guidance for US Laboratories Testing for Zika Virus Infection CDC
Health care and laboratory professionals are instructed to direct Zika virus testing requests to their local or state public health laboratory or to a commercial laboratory that performs Zika testing using a validated assay with demonstrated analytical and clinical performance. Health care and laboratory professionals should follow state or local public health department guidance on notification procedures for suspect cases of Zika virus infection.
Public health laboratories not CDC-designated Zika virus testing laboratories should work with their state or territorial public health department for testing of suspect specimens or referring specimens to CDC.
Within the 50 states, CDC has information about submitting specimens.
Within Puerto Rico, please call 787-706-2399 for testing questions. For submission of specimens, please submit a dengue case investigation report (DCIR) for each specimen.
INCREASING ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION IN CONTEXT OF ZIKA PREPAREDNESS
State and Jurisdictional-level Strategies
US Dept Health and Human Sevices
CDC Response to Zika: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/pdfs/zika_increasing_access_larc.pdf
Contraceptive Use Among Nonpregnant and Postpartum Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancy, and Female High School Students, in Context of Zika Preparedness
Helping women delay or avoid pregnancy during the Zika virus outbreak is a primary strategy to reduce Zika-related adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, including microcephaly and severe fetal brain defects. The best way to reduce the risk is for sexually active women and their partners to correctly and consistently use effective birth control. (LARC), specifically IUDs and implants, the most effective type of reversible birth control inserted or implanted remains highly effective at preventing pregnancy for many years. LARC is safe for most women to use, including female adolescents. To increase access to and availability of LARC, state and jurisdictional level-strategies can be implemented by state, local, and territorial agencies, health systems, and healthcare providers.
Contraceptive Use Among Nonpregnant and Postpartum Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancy, and Female High School Students, in Context of Zika Preparedness — United States, 2011–2013 and 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:780–787. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6530e2
ZIKA & depopulation ZIKA part2, http://www.burbankdigest.com/node/568
GAVI Board has already indicated specific interest in: malaria and cholera
...Schwalbe ended by saying that “we now have new data such as updated DALY estimates that we can include... Comprehensive analyses coupled with our consultation process will ensure we bring concrete recommendations to the GAVI Board for decision in December 2013.”
29 - Cholera
29 - GAVI Vaccine Investment Strategy
Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation
With serious questions being raised about the future of vaccination efforts, the head of the World Bank James Wolfensohn convened a summit of WHO, UNICEF, academics, health ministers, international agencies and the pharmaceutical industry in March 1998. Their agenda: how to start getting vaccines to children who needed them most. Six months later, Bill and Melinda Gates added to the momentum by hosting leading scientists.. challenged their guests to come back with proposals for "breakthrough solutions." In March 1999, a second summit at Bellagio in Italy provided the answer to Gates' challenge. Rather than set up a new international organisation, major players in existing major global immunisation - key US and UN agencies, vaccine industry leaders, leaders of aid agencies and major foundations - working together through a new partnership: the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance).
GAVI’s dream of delivering vaccines to millions of the world's poorest children moved a step closer to reality in November 1999 when the Gates Foundation pledged US$ 750 million to Gavi...Gavi was formally launched in January 2000 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland....
Gavi position statement on Ebola
Gavi has invested more than US$ 50 million to strengthen health systemsEBOLA in countries affected by the outbreak..unfilled needs remain enormous. We will continue to provide support for health systems across the region with a long-term aim of building strong, resilient health infrastructures....Gavi will try to respond to the situation by reprogramming current health and immunisation systems grants towards new health systems needs from the Ebola outbreak... also play an active role in developing strong recovery plans for their health systems....Gavi welcomes the efforts of manufacturers, research institutions and Alliance partners to dramatically accelerate availability of an EBOLA vaccine recommended by the World Health Organizatio
Vaccines are one of the most cost-effective investments in health and development in history. Gavi helps save children’s lives and protect people’s health by increasing u of vaccines in lower-income countries. MORE THAN 8 MILLION DEATHS AVERTED
Since its inception in 2000, has helped developing countries to prevent more than 8 million projected future deaths through support of 10 vaccines: pentavalent, pneumococcal, rotavirus, yellow fever, meningitis A, Japanese encephalitis, human papillomavirus, measles second dose, measles-rubella and rubella.
Source: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance/Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation 2016 Since 2000 Nearly 580 MILLION CHILDREN IMMUNISED Source: WHO/UNICEF 2016
277 MILLION CHILDREN IMMUNISED 2011–2015 MORE THAN 4 MILLION DEATHS AVERTED BETWEEN 2011 AND 2015
The Vaccine Alliance support for vaccines contributed to averting more than 4 million future deaths between 2011 and 2015.
Source: Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance/Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation 2016 Source: WHO/UNICEF 2016
OVER 200 VACCINE INTRODUCTIONS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2015
Gavi supported over 200 vaccine introductions and campaigns in 2011–2015 period – four times as many as in previous five years. Source: Gavi
"If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon...what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes...the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance....We are intellectual prostitutes." New York Times editor, John Swinton, toast at the New York Press Club in 1953
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, New York Times, Time Magazine and the other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
"We are going to have a war on terror which you can never win, and so you can always keep taking people's liberties away. The media is going to convince everybody that the war on terror is real. The ultimate goal is to get everybody in the world chipped with an RFID chip, have all money be on the chips, and if anyone wants to protest what we do, we turn off the chip."
Nicholas Rockefeller to producer Aaron Russo - eleven months before 9/11 World Trade Center attacks
“I can think of no faster way to unite the American people behind George W. Bush than a terrorist attack on an American target overseas. And I believe George W. Bush will quickly unite the American people through his foreign policy.”